Skip to main content

CONVICT ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU; CONVICT ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME-A CASE STUDY

A few months back, I detailed the many factors that need to be considered when contemplating a plea deal and even went into explaining why the system is inherently unfair. For those who missed it, here are the links to those entries.
http://www.whitecollarguru.com/2016/12/to-plea-or-not-to-plea-that-is-question.html
http://www.whitecollarguru.com/2016/12/to-plea-or-not-to-plea-part-2.html
http://www.whitecollarguru.com/2017/02/no-one-ever-said-it-was-going-to-be-fair.html
This is important considering the following story that just happened to someone who I spent time with at the Miami camp.

The original case goes back to 2010. There were a few clubs in Miami Beach that were owned by individuals of Russian descent. Essentially, they arranged for girls to come from Russia, flirt with potential targets and get them drunk. These "bar girls" would then bring the targets back to the Russian owned clubs where they would order more drinks and would be so incapacitated that they did not even know what they were ordering, and did not know what they were paying for the drinks and were too incoherent to even realize that they were signing the receipt. The story was featured on American Greed last year and can be seen at http://www.cnbc.com/video/2016/05/13/american-greed-the-bar-girls-trap.html or https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PgQ6XBykok
Without going into detail, they are all went to trial, were convicted and were sentenced to anywhere for 3 years to 12 years in prison. I was in prison with two of these defendants.
This blog is not dedicated to explaining crimes or going into the deciphering if what they did was illegal. That is what the lawyers are for.

As is the case with most defendants these individuals were offered plea deals. One of them was offered two years in prison if he plead guilty and the other was offered time served as he was held in the Federal Detention Center in Miami while he was awaiting trial. Yes, he was offered a deal whereby he could go home and do no additional time than what he had done while awaiting trial. Yet both these individuals elected to go to trial because they were, you guessed it, "Not Guilty". Maybe it is the innate stubbornness of the Russian psyche but neither of them was able to say they were guilty when each one believed he was not guilty. To this day I cannot imagine what goes through a person's head when he elects to go through the uncertainty of a trial, when he had the opportunity to go home.

As luck would have it, both were convicted. Shocking, I know. Now remember, when a defendant goes to trial, the charges he face are much more severe than the charges in any plea deal. The defendant who was offered two years received 12, which of course meant he would not be immediately eligible for a camp. The defendant who was offered time served received 100 months,. Both of them received more than what the prosecutors recommended and even received a perjury enhancement for lying on the witness stand. Incidentally, most defense lawyers do not allow their clients to take the stand for this very reason! I cannot even begin to fathom what goes through a person's mind when he receives 8 years in prison when he had the opportunity to avoid a trial and additional prison time altogether. I honestly do not know how a person can  live with himself! I had the chance to get to know both of these individuals during my time as a guest of the Federal government and while the first defendant did regret going to trial, the second, the one who turned down time served, did not regret his decision and would even do it again! Is it any wonder the Russians lost the cold war??!! I did not believe him but, sadly, he got such an opportunity.

Virtually every defendant appeals his conviction after being found guilty at trial. While the numbers vary depending on the judicial circuit, it seems that 10% of convictions are overturned. The reasons that a conviction is overturned vary from poor representation, to a technicality, to changes in the law. As I have not had the misfortune of having gone through that process, I am hardly an authority on the appeal process. When a defendant is lucky enough to be one of the 10% that has his conviction overturned, that does not mean he is found innocent; no, it usually simply means he wins the right to another trial.

As luck would have it, after four years or so, this case was overturned on appeal. Incidentally, even without facing a new trial, they were still incarcerated longer than if they had simply plead guilty. The basis was improper jury instructions but a win is a win. In other words, the judge messed up.  I was there when they found out, and to say they were ecstatic would be an understatement. The prosecution made it clear that they were going to retry the case, however. At the same time, they came ready to deal. Their initial deal was for all of them to plead guilty to a lesser charge and go home. The only caveat being, that all of them had to agree, or so I was told. Of course, there was one hold out. Yes, the one who got 8 years instead of time served refused to sign the plea deal because, as he said all day "I'm not guilty!". The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. By that measure, he would have had a plausible insanity defense. In any event, the other Russian in the camp was not allowed to go home because his co-defendant refused to sign the deal. How he did not physically strangle him is beyond me! If there was someone preventing me from seeing my family I doubt I would be so understanding.

In the interim, these guys were stuck inside the camp while the legal system chugged along. Eventually, they were moved from the camp to the Detention Center and were granted a bail hearing where bail was given so that they can prepare for trial once again. Two of the defendants (the one that got 12 years and the one who was not in the camp) took plea deals shortly thereafter and received time served. The crazy one, the one who could have avoided this whole ordeal altogether decided to once again go to trial. Well guess what? In April,he went to trial with the original judge. Again. He was found guilty. Again. He was not granted bail and had to sit in the detention center while he awaited sentencing which took place on July 14, 2017. Instead of sleeping at home he was sleeping in a 6*8 cell with violent criminals.

Last week he finally got his sentencing. The prosecutors recommended he receive 46-57 months. His lawyers obviously recommended less. Now remember the sentencing judge is the same judge that sentenced him the first time. This is the same judge that the appeal alleged ad appeals court agreed  gave improper instructions to the jury resulting in this new trial. It is unlikely this judge is going to look kindly on this defendant. Predictably, the judge handed down a sentence of 100 months. This defendant could have been home six years ago but instead decided to have not one but two trials when there was nothing to be gained from either of them.

Pride is the biggest enemy facing a defendant; aside from the Federal government, that is. Are there innocent people sitting in prison? Most definitely. Is this person innocent? Maybe. Does it really matter? No. What matters is that he is sitting in prison and has no one to blame but himself. All for that dirty word pride. It is insanity to the max. I wish I could feel sorry for him, I really do. But I do not. How could I feel bad for someone who literally brought a prison sentence upon himself. I can only conclude that he is either totally insane or simply enjoys prison! The lesson is clear. When looking at his options and scenarios, a defendant has to be pragmatic. And never ever ever go to trial if there is nothing to be gained! Shame on you!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jew Haters Be Gone!

I try not to get angry. There are a few reasons for this but I have come to realize than getting angry produces few if any tangible results. However, I am not perfect (shocking, I know) and when I see blatant hatred stemming from ignorance and self righteousness I do get angry. I am not naive. I know anti-semitism exists and have come to accept it. I no longer get angry when I see other races making the most ridiculous and incorrect statements about Jews. I just do not care. However, what does anger me to no end is when I see the same type of anti-Jewish rhetoric coming from within the Jewish community. I am well aware this is completely off topic when compared to my other entries, but I do think that as I write it, a message that transcends religion and the underlying theme of anti semitism will emerge.

Last week I wrote about the release of Rabbi Sholom Rubashkin. I spoke about how happy I was to see him reunited with his family and how in many ways he was a true hero. That is my op…

The Defendant Is Hereby Remanded To Custody- My First Day In Prison

The marshals will escort the defendant. Scarier words had never been spoke to me.
October 26, 2015. Exactly two years ago today I was sentenced to 30 months (later reduced to 20) in prison. As luck would have it, I was blessed with a judge who does not believe in voluntary surrender. In other words instead of arriving at a prison camp like 90% of those who plead guilty to a white collar felony, I was escorted by the US Marshals service from the courtroom in front of family and friends who had come to support me. Not exactly my finest moment.

In many ways it is a day that I will never forget yet, paradoxically, my memory of that day is more dream like as though I was watching a Broadway show as a member of the audience when in reality I was the star. Even now, two years later it seems as though my sentencing hearing was yesterday and not so long ago. Ultimately, I spent under 11 months in actual custody, 4 months in a halfway house and two months under home confinement. Obviously, in h…

RUBASHKIN

People are connected. I am not talking about personal relationships with friends and family. Often times we are connected to people we do not even know.  This can be through any sort of medium such a race, religion, professional affiliation of political affiliation. Even though we do not know each other, we are "connected".  As a Jew, I feel connected and sympathize with the plight of another Jew in distress even if I do not know him. The African American community came together to protest what they viewed as widespread discrimination by law enforcement even though 99.9% of those protesting had never even met or heard of the perceived victim.

Life experiences also bond people. There is a bond that exists between those of us who have had the unfortunate experience of going to prison. It is a bond that transcends race and religion. When we can we help one another both inside and outside and always hope for our friends to be released and be successful upon their release from pr…